Skip to content
Back HomeBack Home

Don't Market by the Numbers, Chart Your Own Course

Don't Market by the Numbers, Chart Your Own Course

  • Services
    • Services
    • Pet & Animal Health Marketing
    • Brochure
  • Work
    • Portfolio
      • Work Samples – Writing Projects
    • Case Studies
      • Case Study: Brand Identity – Education
      • Case Study: Copywriting and Content Optimization – Tech
      • Case Study: Content Strategy – FinTech
      • Case Study: Championing Catalogs – CPG
      • Case Study: Direct Mail – Retail
      • Case Study: Audience Targeting – Pharma
      • Case Study: ABM & Marketing Operations – Education
      • Case Study: Digital Media – Technology
      • Case Study: Customer Journey – Financial
    • Clients
      • Testimonials
    • Nursery Rhymes for Marketers
  • Articles & Blog
    • Tip Sheets & Guides
    • Blog
      • Content Marketing
      • Customer Behavior
      • Email Marketing
      • marketing strategy
      • General Business Strategy
      • Social Media
    • More Nursery Rhymes for Marketers
  • Get Started
  • About
    • Nursery Rhymes for Marketers
Home » CM Blog » Blogging » It started with a photo

It started with a photo


During the recent difficult time of civil unrest, which of course put emotions on high, I responded to a picture posted on Linkedin.

ext

The photo was one of a police officer, and included the caption

“Not in the News: Today, 1 million cops flawlessly protected you”.

I responded. I didn’t have to, and heard the voices of authority figures of the past saying not to, just leave it alone. But then I heard my own voice in my head, that said no, I have my own right to my opinion, reaction, and the right to respond.

commentMy comment was:

“Also not in the news: millions of other people doing the job they chose and are paid to do.”

Needless to say my response garnered quite a bit of response, much of which was not pleasant. But my response was not intended to garner pleasantries or approval. I responded because it was a gut reaction, and despite years of voices encouraging me to be silent and stand in the background, under the guise of “taking the higher road” and not to engage, I have a right and a responsibility to use my voice. As the responses came in, I became more focused on the reactions than on my own voice.

As anyone who does not have their head under a rock knows, the movement #BlackLivesMatter has infuriated many, and showing any support publicly to this instantly evokes the response that #AllLivesMatter. In the minds of far too many people it is apparently not possible to want police offers to follow the law and still support police officers overall. It’s a concept that utterly confuses me, and I wanted to test it out using less obvious means, to see if the phrase is what causes the issue, or the underlying bias is at play.

At no point in the discussions that I engaged in ever did I use the phrase #BlackLivesMatter. But what I found was even suggesting that other people do the job they have chosen to do, willingly, and are paid to do, and therefore anyone could expect them to actually do the job, if they aren’t police officers, they are not worthy of acknowledgement.

It was astonishing. So many people respond to the #BlackLivesMatter with #AllLivesMatter, claiming it’s racist. But when it is initiated the other way, by noting in support that yes, people doing their job is not something that really needs to be called out and praised for doing what is expected, is misguided and biased, and clearly against police officers.

Those commenting on the thread jumped to conclusions, and I watched, occasionally stepping in to make a comment, to clarify their their assignment of intent and statements they decided I made, but hadn’t. For the most part, they continued one-sided discussions with their own interpretations and escalations in the absence of responses.

As expected, it became somewhat unhinged, at least by the standards of a professional networking platform.

Admittedly I used the word mansplain at one point, assuming it would be an obvious troll. Again, shocking, I was mansplained to, that I had no business calling someone a misogynist (I didn’t), and was conveniently offered the ability to backtrack from my statement if I so chose. The mansplainer walked right through the open door, even though it was labeled.

It was an interesting as it turned into an unofficial social experiment, to watch people comment themselves into a frenzy. But in the end, it was disturbing, to see this manufactured division that exists because people talk to themselves, based on their own perspectives and assumptions, without even reading the comments in front of them. It’s disturbing, actually. Comment threads are different than conversations, where you can mishear someone and use that as an excuse. In threads, it’s still there, and it’s even more clear that you simply chose to not read what was actually said, and instead insert your own biases.

I’ve done it myself, in interpreting the entire experience.

So bring on the mansplaining, to set me right.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
  • More
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


Post navigation

  • ← Copywriting and Ego
  • Step by Step Guide to Customer/Lead Email Nurturing Strategy →

Chart Your Own Course

Laurissa Doonan
Downingtown, PA 19335
610-462-1409 |
email

Copyright © 2016-2024 Charter Marketing

· © 2025 Laurissa Doonan Consulting - Charter Marketing · Powered by · Designed with the Customizr theme ·

 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d